Logo Logo
Hilfe
Kontakt
Switch language to English
Metacognition of value-based decisions
Metacognition of value-based decisions
Heroes inspire us by staying true to their values, even under pressure. This ability reflects coherence between decisions and intentions, especially in value-based decisions that rely on subjective preferences. Metacognition, the ability to monitor and control one’s decision, helps ensure this coherence. However, its role in moral or complex value-based decisions remains unclear. How does subjective value contribute to our understanding of the function and computation of metacognition? This interdisciplinary thesis develops a conceptual framework positioning metacognition as a “reliability thermostat” that adjusts effort to maintain a desired level of coherence. It argues that value-based monitoring is integral to metacognition, aiding learning and contextual reliability assessments. Empirical findings support this model as in value-based decision, confidence increases in accuracy with learning (detaching from theory of mind) and tracks coherence with subjective moral values. Additionally, individuals seem to exhibit consistent metacognitive profiles across value domains, supporting its general role as a bounded reliability thermostat. By framing metacognition around subjective value and coherence, the thesis opens pathways for applications in social autonomy and therapies aimed at enhancing or restoring cognitive functions. It positions value-based metacognition as vital for fostering responsibility and empowering agents at both personal and societal levels.
Metacognition, value, decision, confidence, learning, reflection, choice
Armand, Oriane
2024
Englisch
Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Armand, Oriane (2024): Metacognition of value-based decisions. Dissertation, LMU München: Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences (GSN)
[thumbnail of Armand_Oriane.pdf]
Vorschau
PDF
Armand_Oriane.pdf

9MB

Abstract

Heroes inspire us by staying true to their values, even under pressure. This ability reflects coherence between decisions and intentions, especially in value-based decisions that rely on subjective preferences. Metacognition, the ability to monitor and control one’s decision, helps ensure this coherence. However, its role in moral or complex value-based decisions remains unclear. How does subjective value contribute to our understanding of the function and computation of metacognition? This interdisciplinary thesis develops a conceptual framework positioning metacognition as a “reliability thermostat” that adjusts effort to maintain a desired level of coherence. It argues that value-based monitoring is integral to metacognition, aiding learning and contextual reliability assessments. Empirical findings support this model as in value-based decision, confidence increases in accuracy with learning (detaching from theory of mind) and tracks coherence with subjective moral values. Additionally, individuals seem to exhibit consistent metacognitive profiles across value domains, supporting its general role as a bounded reliability thermostat. By framing metacognition around subjective value and coherence, the thesis opens pathways for applications in social autonomy and therapies aimed at enhancing or restoring cognitive functions. It positions value-based metacognition as vital for fostering responsibility and empowering agents at both personal and societal levels.