Logo Logo
Hilfe
Kontakt
Switch language to English
On the relationship between science and religion. theory, measurement, and early evidence for the psychological mechanism
On the relationship between science and religion. theory, measurement, and early evidence for the psychological mechanism
While some people may prefer to think of a conflict between science and religion, others may believe that it is not necessarily the case. Drawing on Ian G. Barbour’s taxonomy of the science-religion relationship, this dissertation offers an examination through three pillars: theoretical integration, measurement practice, and mechanistic testing. The first pillar integrates theoretical work and empirical evidence from various scientific disciplines to illustrate the psychological process of relating these domains via a flowchart. This process can lead people to adopt one of five conceptualizations: Conflict, Compartment, Context-Switch, Complementary, or Consonance. The second pillar aims to develop a measure that captures these conceptualizations by assuming that the construct is unidimensional and bipolar, and that people respond to the scale items according to an unfolding response process. The third pillar experimentally tests how these mental models affect people’s evaluation of the utility of scientific or religious explanations. The results show that perceptions of conflict and religiosity predict evaluations of religious, but not scientific, explanations. This asymmetry suggests that scientific explanations are primarily evaluated on their epistemic merits, while religious explanations are filtered through pre-existing beliefs. This dissertation, which consists of one theoretical paper and four empirical studies, offers novel insights into how people navigate competing belief systems and has some practical implications for science communication.
Not available
Zein, Rizqy
2025
Englisch
Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Zein, Rizqy (2025): On the relationship between science and religion: theory, measurement, and early evidence for the psychological mechanism. Dissertation, LMU München: Fakultät für Psychologie und Pädagogik
[thumbnail of Zein_Rizqy.pdf]
Vorschau
PDF
Zein_Rizqy.pdf

1MB

Abstract

While some people may prefer to think of a conflict between science and religion, others may believe that it is not necessarily the case. Drawing on Ian G. Barbour’s taxonomy of the science-religion relationship, this dissertation offers an examination through three pillars: theoretical integration, measurement practice, and mechanistic testing. The first pillar integrates theoretical work and empirical evidence from various scientific disciplines to illustrate the psychological process of relating these domains via a flowchart. This process can lead people to adopt one of five conceptualizations: Conflict, Compartment, Context-Switch, Complementary, or Consonance. The second pillar aims to develop a measure that captures these conceptualizations by assuming that the construct is unidimensional and bipolar, and that people respond to the scale items according to an unfolding response process. The third pillar experimentally tests how these mental models affect people’s evaluation of the utility of scientific or religious explanations. The results show that perceptions of conflict and religiosity predict evaluations of religious, but not scientific, explanations. This asymmetry suggests that scientific explanations are primarily evaluated on their epistemic merits, while religious explanations are filtered through pre-existing beliefs. This dissertation, which consists of one theoretical paper and four empirical studies, offers novel insights into how people navigate competing belief systems and has some practical implications for science communication.