Logo
DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings
Robel, Stefanie (2010): Diverse Functions of Astroglial Cells: The Role of Molecular Pathways Regulating Polarity. Dissertation, LMU München: Faculty of Biology
[img]
Preview
PDF
Robel_Stefanie.pdf

15Mb

Abstract

Astrocytes perform many functions in the adult brain and even act as neural stem cells after brain injury (Buffo et al., 2008) or in regions where neurogenesis persists, e.g. in the subependymal zone of the lateral ventricle. The stem cell astrocytes possess an apicobasal polarity as they are coupled by adherens junctions to neighbouring ependymal cells and possess an apical membrane domain with CD133 and Par complex proteins and a basolateral membrane domain including contact of processes to the basement membrane (BM). This is notably different from parenchymal astrocytes that only have contacts to the BM under physiological conditions. The major underlying question is how differences between neural stem cells and 'normal' astrocytes are generated and how polarity mechanisms may be involved in generating this difference. Here, I set out to determine the role of BM contact and the Par complex for astrocyte function in the normal brain parenchyma as well as in the neurogenic niche. First, I examined the influence of BM-mediated signaling by conditional deletion of β1-integrin, one of the major BM receptors in the CNS. The use of specific Cre lines resulted in a loss of β1-integrin protein only at postnatal stages either in both glia and neurons or specifically in neurons. Strikingly, only the former resulted in reactive gliosis, with the hallmarks of reactive astrocytes comprising astrocyte hypertrophy and upregulation of the intermediate filaments GFAP and Vimentin as well as pericellular components, such Tenascin-C and the 473HD proteoglycan. This reaction to the loss of β1-integrin was further accompanied by non-cell autonomous activation of microglial cells. However, neither reactive astrocytes nor microglia divided, suggesting that the loss of β1-integrin-mediated signaling is not sufficient to elicit proliferation of these cells. Interestingly, this partial reactive gliosis appeared in the absence of cell death and blood-brain barrier disturbances. As these effects did not appear after neuron-specific deletion of β1-integrin, we conclude that β1-integrin-mediated signaling in astrocytes is required to promote their acquisition of a mature, non-reactive state. Interestingly, neural stem cell astrocytes in the SEZ were not affected in their proliferation and fate, suggesting that β1-integrins are not involved in the regulation of these stem cell properties. However, loss of β1-integrins interfered with the normal dedifferentiation of astrocytes into stem cells after brain injury. Next, I examined the role of Cdc42, a key activator of the Par complex, but also a mediator of β1-integrin signalling in adult stem cell astrocytes. Therefore, I genetically deleted this small RhoGTPase in astroglia at adult stages. In contrast to what has been observed during development, loss of Cdc42 had no influence on proliferation or fate of subependymal zone astrocytes. These effects on adult astroglia-like stem cells differ profoundly from effects on parenchymal astrocytes upon injury. Here, deletion of Cdc42 resulted in severe defects of astrocyte polarity as measured by centrosome reorientation and oriented process extension in the scratch assay in vitro. In vivo, astrocytes could still orient towards the injury site suggesting the existence of compensating signaling pathways. However, the increase of astrocyte numbers around the injury site was reduced. Impaired proliferation certainly contributes to this phenotype. Most importantly, loss of Cdc42 resulted in a significantly increased size of brain injury enlightening the importance of this pathway in the wound reaction towards brain injury. Conversely, no effects were seen by Cdc42 deletion in astrocytes in the absence of injury, suggesting that integrin-mediated signaling from the BM maintains the hallmarks of mature non-reactive astrocytes while Cdc42, most likely via activation of the Par complex, regulates polarity and dedifferentiation after injury. Taken together, this work elucidated for the first time specific signaling pathways regulating the role of astrocytes as stem cells during wound reaction of the injured brain.